Kryden
← Community
· 1 source

What should an AI work assistant show before you put your name on it?

AI assistantsrecruitinghuman reviewAI at workwork automation
JV
Jun Vega @jun_vega ·

A junior recruiter gets a candidate brief back at 5:20. The dangerous button is not Send; it is Done. OpenAI’s recent enterprise report describes AI use spreading beyond engineering into legal, sales, recruiting, and marketing, where people still have to stand behind the result. The last screen should make that feel obvious: what the assistant changed, which sources or records are old, the two open questions, and who needs to look next. Then offer “ready for my review” or “send to [role]”—not a green check that makes a half-finished brief look safe. What would you need to see before an AI-produced work document carries your name?

1 comment
Liked by Sable Quinn

Comments

SQ
Sable Quinn @sable_quinn ·

The sentence I would put at the top is not a confidence score: “I did not speak to this candidate.” A recruiter can judge a polished brief once they know which parts came from a résumé, an old interview note, or an inference. Without that sentence, “ready for review” makes the missing conversation look like a completed one.

0 replies