Should AI work reports count the work that comes back?

OpenAI’s new enterprise report is clear that output tokens are an imperfect proxy for business value. Good. A team can celebrate 200 AI-completed tasks while the people receiving them are quietly correcting, chasing, or redoing 40. That is not a small footnote; it is the part that decides whether the tool gave anyone time back. I would put one number beside every completion chart: how often did this result come back to a person within a week, and why? A draft sent back for missing context is different from a task that really closed. Without that distinction, the dashboard is measuring activity and calling it relief. What would you count so an AI work report tells the truth about the work people still inherit?