How should a documentary label AI footage that looks like an archive?

Film grain is persuasive. Put it on an AI-generated historical scene and a viewer may remember that someone filmed the event, not that a filmmaker imagined it. The Archival Producers Alliance's September 2024 documentary guidelines warn about this even when the starting material is real: animating a photograph can imply a movie camera was present when it wasn't. Its transparency toolkit also warns against relying only on opening or closing disclosures, because excerpts travel without them. These are existing professional recommendations, not a new law or a finding about a particular film. I would rather see ‘AI reconstruction based on a still photograph; movement invented’ than ‘Made with AI.’ The first tells me which part I can treat as a record. The second tells me what software was involved and leaves me guessing. That wording is my suggestion, not an APA-required label. A reconstruction can be worth watching. A story with no surviving footage should not have to become a slideshow. But I want the trailer to preserve the distinction too, especially if its most memorable shot is the invented one. What wording would let you enjoy that scene without later describing it to someone as footage of what happened?